Skip to content

TOC4U

You are here: TOC 4U Home
A Home for Theory of Constraints
Critical Chain Project Management

TOC Project Management, Critical Chain

Ciritical Chain project management is consistingly adding value through better planning and execution in the single and multi-project environment.

UPDATE:

There has been a new self-learning program developed, specifically for the TOC Project Management (Critical Chain) , which will be presented bij Dr. Eli Goldratt in a webcast from February 2008. Here he will present how the TOC project management solution will result in ever flourishing project management companies.


More information can be found on:    GOLDRATT WEBSITE


A brochure can be found here: GOLDRATT WEBCAST SERIES


"the phenomenon that many students will begin to fully apply themselves to a task only just before a deadline"  Student Syndrome

“Work expands to fill (and often exceed) the time allowed.”Parkinson’s Law

“Whatever can go wrong, will.”Murphy’s Law

The Critical Chain Approach is a way to manage all of an organization's projects holistically. Developed using the Theory of Constraints improvement methodology, Critical Chain puts forward only a few strategic changes in how projects are planned, scheduled and managed.

However, these few changes are resulting in claims of tripling the number of projects completed, reducing project cycle times (the project's elapsed time or duration) by 25% or better, and increasing company revenues by tens of millions of dollars. Critical Chain methods focus mostly on improving project cycle time (within quality and scope requirements). Sometimes, conscious tradeoffs are made in resource cost, in order to generate a much higher Throughput from the project.
This magnitude of improvement implies that Critical Chain is impacting the entire process of managing projects, and not just one small part.
This is wonderful news for organizations that have adopted a professional approach to project management. Every TOC improvement effort recognizes that most of what we are doing today is good. We want to find only one or two leverage points to change the system, so that the results are far better than with current approaches.
Last Updated ( Friday, 23 November 2007 )
Read more...
 
CRM, The nightmare of a Sales Representative
  

CRM: The nightmare of a sales executive

 

CRM implementations have duly followed the path of the early accounting packages, manufacturing (MRP I, MRP II, scheduling), Supply Chain, Human resources (the total is called ERP) and now finally the business is starting to “tame” sales.

Where sales used to be the domain of fast cars, expense accounts and heroes bringing in orders to save the company, we now starting to whip sales into shape.

Sure, we have some resistance, but did we not have the same thing at HR and the other components of the ERP systems we have implemented? The solution seems simple: we throw in some change management, and treat sales as completely illiterate as they do not seem to know how to fill in those fields as we expect them to be. We have even heard about bonuses been paid to fill in the system, so the next step will be to provide data capturers to each sales representative??

How come so many of these CRM implementations fail to provide us with the results we are expecting. The logic is rock solid: If we have all the information, to take better sales decisions, turnover must go up?

We can get all the information with the push of a button, if we can believe the ‘intangible’ benefit promised to us, by the CRM suppliers such as:

 

  • Reductions in operating costs (per transaction)
  • A higher percentage of cross-selling due to offering a single point of contact
  • More success in attracting new customers and closing deals faster, through quicker and more efficient responses to customer leads and customer information
  • Simplification of marketing and sales processes by understanding customer needs
  • Better customer service - through improved responsiveness and understanding that builds customer loyalty and decreases customer "churn"
  • Increasing Revenue
  • Increasing Customer Retention
  • Reducing Costs or Keeping Costs Under Control
  • Improving Service
  • Adding New Customers
  • Creating Competitive Advantage
  • Reduce non-value added interactions, allowing agents/producers to concentrate on new business
  • Design and run telemarketing campaigns geared towards cross-selling, renewals
  • Provide up-to-date information to end-customers at any time, anywhere
  • Assist in attracting new customers and directing them to the appropriate channels
  •  

    The promise of customer relationship management is captivating, but in practice it can be perilous. When it works, CRM allows companies to gather customer data swiftly, identify the most valuable customers over time, and increase customer loyalty by providing customized products and services. It also reduces the costs of serving these customers and makes it easier to acquire similar customers down the road. But when CRM doesn't work--which is often--it can lead to Monster-like (and monster-sized) debacles.

    So where are we now, when we see the figures the monster-like debacles seem to win. Looking at the latest figures from the ICT barometer of Ernst and Young shows that close to 70 percent of CRM implementations fail. Research from viewpoint CRM in July 2006 reports about the same.

     

    The common cause seems to be in:  The CRM system does not solve the problem of the sales executive, or the “what is in it for me” question.

    If there is no way sales management can review the problems of what is keeping the account executives from achieving more sales, or support in increasing the win rate, there will be limited benefits for sales executives. You can throw in all the training and change management you want, it does not solve the opportunity constraints.

    In order to evaluate if your current, or proposed CRM system will do the job, a sales constraint analysis might be recommended. This is one sure way, to find the monsters, or prevent a monster-like debacle.

    We suggest you manage you sales and opportunity constraints, before they start to manage you. Our experience has been that CRM systems are necessary, but not sufficient.

    Last Updated ( Tuesday, 02 October 2007 )